▲ | a99c43f2d565504 5 days ago | |||||||||||||
Offtopic, and no one asked, but I'm going to advertise anyway: Helix is a good alternative to (neo)vim for anyone who wants a terminal editor with vimotions(ish) but doesn't like configuring or scripting. That was the selling point that made me stay with it: The out-of-the-box experience was close enough to what I was hoping to end at but gave up with neovim due to the hassle required. It is opinionated of course, but the default behavior and appearance of Helix felt much more appropriate than that of neovim. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | CollinEMac 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I'm a Neovim user but I have to agree with the recommendation. If you've wanted to check out vim/emacs but were nervous Helix is a good place to start. I do wish there was at least the option to use vim keybindings in Helix though. The Helix keybindings are mostly the same but just different enough to be annoying if you're already used to vim. Edit: typo | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | tomku 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I actually like Helix a lot too, but it is different than (neo)vim in a lot of significant ways. It feels like alternate-universe vim more than just better defaults. It also doesn't just not require scripting, it doesn't support scripting (yet). Very interesting in its own right but it might not be what you want if you're familiar with (neo)vim already. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | bbkane 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I still have to interact with files on servers I don't control, so I still need to keep basic vim motions in my working set memory unfortunately | ||||||||||||||
▲ | wredcoll 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Can I use wasd for my movement keys? |