Do your pros and cons versus ICL. It's pricier. But it comes with fewer side effects, is fully reversible and allows for refinement down the road.

▲

mmmpetrichor 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

My cornea was too thin for lasik, they offered me ICL but it was like 13k vs 5k. And the surgery seems scarier. And apparently they had complaints about the previous generation ICL causing hightened corneal pressure, so the current one with a hole in the center is pretty new. I kept my contacts.

	▲	JumpCrisscross 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		> the surgery seems scarier It’s cataract surgery. Apart from infection practically all the risks are lower than with LASIK. The principal downside is cost. (That said, I haven’t done it yet—I am on daily contacts.)

▲

cmrdporcupine 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Looks like ICL isn't generally available after the age of 45.

	▲	JumpCrisscross 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		> ICL isn't generally available after the age of 45 It’s essentially cataract surgery, so not for safety reasons. FDA doesn’t recommend it past 45, I believe, because if you have age-related eye degeneration ICL won’t help where LASIK might and because it’s most studied in the 21 to 45 age group. Would be surprised if a surgeon said no due to age alone.