>Logical positivism is flawed because the principle of verification cannot be verified.

Why not? It works, thus it verifies itself.

So do an infinite number of sets of statements which include a false one. Circular arguments are obviously not reliable.

	▲	GoblinSlayer 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		That's a hypothesis of a counterexample, though, not a fact of a counterexample.

goatlover 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

It's not working if it excludes subjective experience by definition. Makes it useless for the consciousness debate.

	▲	GoblinSlayer 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		It doesn't exclude subjective experience.