Who told that? I still hear K&R being recommended as introduction material.

If you want to write portable/production-grade C code, well definitely need to study another references.

There are very few resources for learning C which aren't themselves full of terrible C.

If you want a short introduction with the caveat that it only covers C89, only covers parts of it, and doesn't cover e.g. POSIX or anything outside of standard C then K&R2 + errata is fine.

If you want a long book on C which has a more modern approach then there is K. N. King's C a Modern Approach.

Jens' book is at least vouched for by https://iso-9899.info/wiki/Books . So I have to assume it's also okay.

▲

adamors 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Exactly, I was looking into refreshing my C knowledge recently and K&R is still heavily recommended.

▲

flohofwoe 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

The problem with K&R is that there never was a third edition that covered C99, which compared to C89 is almost a new language.

K&R is an interesting historical artifact about the basic design decisions of the C language and definitely recommended reading material, but you're not doing yourself a favour using it as reference or for learning the language. For that it is vastly outdated, C ist a much more enjoyable and powerful language since C99.

▲

pjmlp 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Go with such a book instead,

https://www.manning.com/books/modern-c

▲

adamors 4 days ago | parent [-]

How does this compare to https://nostarch.com/effective-c-2nd-edition ?

	▲	pjmlp 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		I guess it is also a good one, both authors are still active on WG14, if I am not mistaken.

▲

pjmlp 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Because most people know no better, and recommend their UNIX heros.

This is a more useful book for modern days,

https://www.manning.com/books/modern-c

flohofwoe already put it out clearly on his comment.