| |
| ▲ | barkerja 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | | For me, the editor is still the most important component of my tooling. The AI features are secondary to my needs/wants when it comes to an editor. Zed is hitting all the checkboxes when it comes to performance and user experience (yeah, I care about that in my editor). I'm not a hardcore user of AI, but I do make use of Zed's inline suggestions and occasional use of Opus 4.1 through my Zed subscription. | | |
| ▲ | kar1181 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | | This is it, in terms of pure text editing zed is the best GUI land editor I've used. Not quite there with emacs/vim but it's a much more accessible environment and more convenient for typical workloads. | |
| ▲ | dkersten 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I agree. I used to use vscode, then switched to Zed and used it for over a year (without AI). In February of this year, I started using Cursor to try out the AI features and I realised I really hated vscode now. Once Zed shipped agent mode, I switched back, and haven’t looked back. I very strongly never want to use vscode again. |
| |
| ▲ | komali2 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm in the same boat but a neovim/cursor user. I desperately wish there was a package I could use in nvim that matched the multiline, file-aware autocomplete feature of Cursor. Of course I've tried supermaven, copilot etc, but I've only ever gotten those to work as in-line completions. They can do multiline but only from where my cursor is. What I love about Cursor is that I can spam tab and make a quick change across a whole file. Plus its suggestions are far faster and far better than the alternative. That said, vscode's UX sucks ass to me. I believe it's the best UX for people that want a "good enough and just works" editor, but I'm an emacs/vim (yes both) guy and I don't like taking my hands off the keyboard ever. Vscode just doesn't have a good keyboard only workflow with vim bindings like emacs and nvim do. |
|