| ▲ | beoberha 5 days ago |
| I am happy to be proven wrong but I’m shocked they believe there is a market for this size at all, let alone at $450! The sample text on the stock images looks useless. I wanted to love my RM2 so much. The write path is great. Writing notes on it during a meeting is a genuinely good experience. The read path: not so much. EInk UXs are so clunky especially when you’re used to how fluid phones are. Forget scrolling through your notes - It’s maddening. Pretty good ereader though. |
|
| ▲ | noobly 5 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| I only began to love my RM2 when I stopped trying to use it as a PDF reader and writer and instead only a scratch paper replacement. But it’s not as economical if limited to this. I do wish they’d improve the PDF usability or embrace open sourcing the UI. There’s a lot of features that should be easy to implement, like split screen or floating sticky notes, but they seem almost wholly focused on the hardware. I thought it’d be the ultimate tool for studying math and saving money on books, thus paying for itself, but it’s just not there yet and I’m not sure they plan to get it there. |
| |
| ▲ | ryukoposting 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Is there an alternative to Remarkable that offers good drawing/writing, but at a lower price? That's the only thing I'd want. I have stacks of dot-rule notebooks full of various notes and sketches. It'd be nice to have a replacement for all that. | | |
| ▲ | nicbou 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I considered all the options back in 2021 and went with the iPad Mini. My reasons: much better software for sketching, not bound to a single ereader app, multiple ways to send stuff around, perfect size. Many years later, I would still choose the same. I use it to annotate webpages, sketch, read books and read queued articles in instapaper. It's distraction-free but still connected. I can Airdrop drawings or load my handwritten notes on the Macbook app. Tap to define is so good I've absent-mindedly tried it on a paper book. The LED screen is great for some things and bad for others. You have to turn it on and unlock it. You can't SSH into it or sync your drawings as simple files. Otherwise, it's really good. | | |
| ▲ | mbreese 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I like using my iPad better than my RM2 for similar reasons (I have both, but really only use the iPad anymore). The pickup is much better on the iPad, in my opinion. However, one thing that I think makes the biggest difference is adding a screen protector. I particularly like the ones from https://paperlike.com/. It adds a layer that makes it less like writing on glass and more like writing on paper. For me, this was the biggest increase in usability for taking notes. |
| |
| ▲ | dotancohen 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The Boox is a little cheaper, I have one. It's mostly just an Eink Android tablet. I absolutely love it. It will run most Android apps (modulo Eink screen support). The built-in note taking app is terrific. | |
| ▲ | roumenguha 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Ratta's Supernote is an option. The second hand market isn't as good, though, for buyers. | | |
| ▲ | yencabulator 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Interestingly, https://supernote.com/pages/supernote-nomad says > Customize Your System > A Linux-based system will be open in the future for community modifications and customizations. > *Not built-in with the device Anyone have details? Internet says it's a very custom Android. https://www.ereaders.org/supernote-manta-versatile-durable-e... | |
| ▲ | ninjin 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | reMarkable (1) user here since 2019, what does the software stack look like for the Supernote? The A6 looks interesting as a form factor for someone like me that uses it solely for note taking (all I want is a "non-linear notebook") rather than annotation and reading (I use a printer and scanner for annotation/feedback and an "ancient", never-online Kindle for reading books). reMarkable has always been open-ish rather than properly open, so I would hope for Supernote to be more open to the idea of users having access to code and control over their devices (even if I never connect my reMarkable to the network). | | |
| ▲ | krabizzwainch 4 days ago | parent [-] | | The software support is decent. Currently it's running an old version of Android that allows you to side load apps. They are supposedly working on moving the OS over to a custom Linux build, but we haven't really seen anything with that. They do release updates fairly frequently and they have a publicly viewable Trello software development board so you can see the status of features they are working on. |
| |
| ▲ | afc 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | +1 I own two Supernote (Nomad and Manta) and I can only recommend them. | | |
| ▲ | barrell 5 days ago | parent [-] | | +2 to supernotes ratta. Amazing product, amazing company | | |
| ▲ | tsfenwick 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Love my supernote as well | | |
| ▲ | daniel_iversen 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Same, the writing experience on the supernote is extremely good (most reviewers say it’s the best because it mimics writing on a stack of paper) and the parts are supposedly replaceable |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | rjsw 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The PineNote is only slightly cheaper, I suspect that Remarkable isn't making a lot of profit on their product. | |
| ▲ | nunez 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The Boox Go 10 is ~$400 and has a note-taking app built in. While it runs Android, the note taking experience is poor with apps other than the built-in one. | |
| ▲ | kitchi 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Honestly I found the base iPad excellent for this. The writing experience isn't a lot like paper, but is still quite good. You can get a little closer by applying a matte screen guard. | | |
| ▲ | nunez 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I heard these destroy the Pencil tips and are pretty loud. Is that true? |
| |
| ▲ | _Algernon_ 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Paper? | | |
| ▲ | Zambyte 4 days ago | parent [-] | | They specifically said they want to replace their paper usage. |
|
| |
| ▲ | freilanzer 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > only a scratch paper replacement. But it’s not as economical if limited to this. That's exactly the use case though. It's a replacement for pen and paper, and the lack of functionality is seen as a feature. |
|
|
| ▲ | branon 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I found the lack of backlight and built-in dictionary to mostly cripple the e-reading experience on rM2. Format support wasn't great either, only PDF and EPUB. Which does cover most bases, to be fair. AZW3 and MOBI aren't dealbreakers, but... really, no TXT? |
| |
| ▲ | pkhuong 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | RM Pro (and this new product) has a backlight. I print everything to pdf when I want to read on the remarkable. | |
| ▲ | squigz 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | No dictionary on an e-reader?! What the heck? Can you at least install your own or is there simply no lookup functionality at all? | | |
| ▲ | Arainach 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | The reMarkable isn't an e-reader. It can display books, but that's not its primary purpose. If you want an e-reader, there are many significantly cheaper options. | | |
| ▲ | kstrauser 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | But… don’t you sometimes want a dictionary when you write? That’s not a reading-mode-only tool by a long shot. | | |
| ▲ | FireBeyond 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I feel that this is a "writer" around the note concept, versus long-form writing (where a dictionary could certainly make more sense). But I'm sketching, diagramming, etc., more so than anything else (I don't own, though I've been interested in this and the Scribe, and given that I barely use the Pencil on my iPad, I'm having difficulty justifying it to myself, although I might check out the return policies...) | |
| ▲ | Arainach 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | No. I don't use the dictionary on my Kindle. I've never missed it on my reMarkable. Not while reading and definitely not while writing. | | |
| ▲ | kstrauser 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Huh. Everyone’s workflows are different. I surely wouldn’t want to be without one. | | |
| ▲ | esseph 5 days ago | parent [-] | | It may be once every 2-3 years, if that, when I pull out a dictionary. Never something I seem to need. | | |
| ▲ | kstrauser 4 days ago | parent [-] | | It’s bursty for me, too. I won’t use one for ages, then I read something like Infinite Jest where I’m looking something up every other page. That’s super easy on Kobo readers and I’d hate not having it elsewhere. | | |
| ▲ | esseph 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I'd just use my phone, honestly. It's in my pocket and has access to much of the worlds information. | | |
| ▲ | kstrauser 4 days ago | parent [-] | | And now I'm reading/writing with 2 devices. Eh. | | |
| ▲ | esseph 4 days ago | parent [-] | | You're already carrying that device though, it's not an addition to your pocket. In fact, I'd argue the 2nd device is actually a problem. | | |
| ▲ | squigz 4 days ago | parent [-] | | No, you are. Not everyone reads when they have their phone on them, or otherwise have their phone on them 24/7. When I'm reading, my phone is at least on a table, if not in another room. | | |
| ▲ | esseph 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Ah, that's fair! I guess I consider a device like that, for me, to be mostly used when traveling! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | adgjlsfhk1 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For the price it feels like it should be a good e-reader also. | |
| ▲ | squigz 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | The fact that they're so expensive is, to me anyway, a pretty good reason to expect basic functionality like that. | | |
| ▲ | Arainach 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Every feature is an eternal maintenance price until the company goes bankrupt (or an opportunity to piss off the handful of users who use it when you cut it). I'd much rather they focus their limited time on polishing things that matter more. | | |
| ▲ | squigz 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Yes, nobody is denying that "every feature is an eternal maintenance price" But the maintenance price of such basic features is absurdly low. Seriously, we're talking about a basic dictionary lookup. We're not talking about massive, expansive features that will require many hours of maintenance. Anyway, if you don't use a dictionary at all, even while reading - and you think a "handful of users" use them - then this conversation probably is not going to go anywhere. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | loughnane 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Granted I've only used a remarkable as an e-reader, but i read a lot of paper books. I don't understand why this is such a necessary feature. Most people don't read paper books with a dictionary handy. | | |
| ▲ | squigz 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Of course not, because that would be annoying and unwieldy. On the other hand, you can add expansive dictionaries for every language to an ereader for the low, low weight of... nothing at all. I suspect if you compare the usage of dictionaries among paper book readers vs ereader users, the latter use them more often - probably at least partially because they're so much easier to use. I suspect the incidence of not understanding a word would be pretty much the same. For myself, I read a lot of older books with archaic and niche terms, so it's practically required to be able to look things up if I want to really understand what's going on. (As an aside, I looked up a definition on Google just writing this to ensure I was using a word properly. :P) | |
| ▲ | nowahe 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm not a native English speaker, but I read a lot of books in their original English. Being able to quickly look up a word you've never encountered is a god send I find myself really missing this feature when I occasionally read a paper book, thinking about clicking the word on the page to get a definition. | | |
| ▲ | dzhiurgis 4 days ago | parent [-] | | That's how I got hooked on macos nearly 20 years ago. Dictionary + thesaurus taught me so much. |
| |
| ▲ | Ancapistani 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | When reading on my iPad or Kindle (back when I had one of those), I would regularly encounter a word used in a context slightly different from my understanding of the word - so I'd quickly skim the definition to fill in the gap in my knowledge that this made apparent. I _do_ miss that functionality on the reMarkable devices. It seems odd to me that it's not included; a dictionary isn't a huge file, and the devices have more than ample storage for their intended purpose. I used my daily for a couple of years, and I don't think I've ever deleted anything from them. | |
| ▲ | dbalatero 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'd suppose it depends on things like your vocabulary level, if the content you're reading is your first language, if you're reading more niche things, etc. | |
| ▲ | shepherdjerred 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's incredibly useful for obvious reasons |
| |
| ▲ | Qwertious 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The rM2 basically isn't an e-reader. It's a PDF viewer with a focus on annotation, and it's a notebook. Any ability to read ebooks is just circumstantial. | | |
| ▲ | squigz 4 days ago | parent [-] | | You and the other commenters who are saying this know that... devices can do multiple things, right? That's why phones don't just call people anymore. Anyway, I don't really see why reading a PDF means one wouldn't need a dictionary. A lot of PDFs - that I read anyway - tend to be more technical stuff; looking stuff up is helpful there too. | | |
| ▲ | kstrauser 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I’m a little surprised at the pushback, too. I read lots of things on other devices where it’s easy to select a new word and see its meaning. And it seems like such an incredibly cheap feature to implement and support that I can’t imaging not having it. |
|
| |
| ▲ | branon 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There is no lookup functionality at all that I could find. You cannot install your own dictionary on the stock firmware. I wound up down the https://toltec-dev.org/ rabbit hole which was fun and gets me additional features but has its own issues (suspend/resume is dodgy sometimes now) Again to be fair the rM2 is not sold as an _e-reader_ per se. But regardless I do find the e-reading experience weak. | | |
| ▲ | squigz 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > Again to be fair the rM2 is not sold as an _e-reader_ per se. But regardless I do find the e-reading experience weak. It's just such basic functionality that... why would you not, if even a small function of the device is indeed to read files? Honestly from what I'm reading in this thread I'm rather turned off by ReMarkable now, which is sort of disappointing. Still, I'm glad to see more and more e-ink options. | | |
| ▲ | Ancapistani 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | reMarkable is adamant that their devices are "digital notebooks" - no more, no less. They intentionally do not implement features that aren't in support of this use case. FWIW, I think that makes sense from their perspective. There are a ton of eReaders out there, but reMarkable is the only company that I'm aware of that focuses specifically on this use case, to the detriment of others. They don't _want_ them to be world-class eReaders, because then they would have to support the features that market wants. They want to support a smaller market niche. They're clear about that, too. If anything, I wish more companies would focus on a specific use case and stick to their guns when it comes to scope creep. | | |
| ▲ | kstrauser 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Huh. Other people have said similar but yours is the first post that resonated with me. Ok, sure. That makes sense. It still feels odd to me because it seems like all the “hard” parts are in place, but that’s their business model. I do still contend that a subscription fee on top of the cost for a single purpose device is a bridge too far, though. I’d strongly consider one to see if it’s truly that great as a note taker if it weren’t for that. I’d hate renting features on a premium device. | |
| ▲ | squigz 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | "Basic dictionary lookup" does not equate to "world class e-readers" |
| |
| ▲ | wltr 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ditto! I was a fan, planned to buy it some day later (it’s a bit expensive for my use case of mostly reading, I utilise old Kindle for that). |
| |
| ▲ | beoberha 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah I’m not suggesting anyone go out of their way to buy it as an ereader but it does the job for me considering it would otherwise be a paperweight. |
| |
| ▲ | kadoban 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You can install koreader pretty easily. It's way better than their built in reader. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | fluidcruft 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm actually in the market for something this size, but it's too expensive for me given what I know about reMarkable's inconvenience. I'd pick it over a kindle scribe, but not sure I'd pick it over a boox or supernote. I haven't decided if I actually care about color yet. MyDeepGuide's review of reMarkables color tech has me pretty interestes in it... but I don't know I actually need color personally. I have a colleague who has a reMarkable and it seems pretty annoying software wise. Especially at this size I want ebooks easily loaded. I mostly have a very aged Kindle that needs replaced and I would like a small digital notepad. Boox fits the bill generally. I have a larger boox, it's a little quirky and a bit too heavy to hold comfortably but works fine after some configuration. |
| |
| ▲ | cooperadymas 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Supernote has a similarly sized product if you want the format but with more software functionality. There's also a company called Viwoods making "AI" enabled e-ink tablets. I have heard significantly less about them so far, but they have a mini version which is roughly e-reader sized. | |
| ▲ | calmbell 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Check out the Boox Palma 2. I love mine and it has an actual operating system (Android 13). | | |
| ▲ | fluidcruft 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | The Palma 2 doesn't have writing support does it? I have been looking at the Boox Go 7... I have a Boox Note Air and generally like it a lot after the major software upgrade it got when Air 2 was released and also particularly running Android has been quite handy (for syncing journal articles with Zotero). But I am also very curious about Supernote Nomad and may go that way if I decide backlight doesn't matter. I do like backlight for reading in be without bothering my wife... And so I keep spinning in indecision... | | |
| ▲ | calmbell 3 days ago | parent [-] | | The Palma 2 doesn't have stylus support. I seriously considered the Supernote Nomad, the modular design is neat, but went with the Palma 2 for the backlight and the Boox software, which seems to be superior to Supernote for everything but writing and notes. If my primary use case were note-taking rather than reading, I would have gone with the Supernote Nomad. |
| |
| ▲ | ocdtrekkie 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Heh I saw that mentioned on a review of this unit, but running Android makes it a nonstarter. The price point is much more reasonable though. | | |
| ▲ | MobiusHorizons 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | What’s wrong with android? I enjoy that it makes boox devices more expandable. For instance I installed termux and used a bluetooth keyboard for a very interesting development environment (vim + c compiler) | | |
| ▲ | ekianjo 4 days ago | parent [-] | | You won't be able to install anything soon once Google puts its thumb on sideloading. Investing in Android in mid 2025 is a lost cause. | | |
| ▲ | fluidcruft 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Why would Boox disable sideloading on their own Android build? Your comment makes as much sense as saying Google is going to disable sideloading on LineageOS and GrapheneOS. Boox doesn't give a flying shit about Google's Android certification program. Google has no claws on devices that have to sideload Play Store. | |
| ▲ | MobiusHorizons 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Is that true for people building off of open source android components (like Boox is doing)? What would you recommend as an alternative? As others have said, I doubt Google can disable sideloading when google play must be sideloaded on the device. |
|
| |
| ▲ | MrMorden 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm fine with Android, but not Android (or any other OS) from 2022. | | |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | rtpg 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| tbh the write path on just paper is so good, and at least for me it's very rare that I need to actually digitize anything. I just invested in a printer that works and print out a lot of stuff I want to deeply annotate. Otherwise I have the ipad for some other stuff. I really enjoy eink for reading but it's really a super specific market. Competing against the ipad is tough! The generalist devices tend to get so good that the specialized devices stop being worth it. |
| |
| ▲ | beoberha 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Agreed, but paper fails at organizing. My brain loves folder structures and hyper specific note files. Remarkable seemed like the perfect device for me. I’ve settled on markdown in vscode and a todo list app. | | |
| ▲ | rtpg 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | My experience has been that it's very easy to flip through a pile of papers, and I tend to "know" where the info is. The beauty of physical interfaces like for paper is that you really can just flip through a stack while talking to someone and find what you need. The big thing that I think works well in paper world is simply having things organized chronologically. I often remember around when I collected a piece of info. | |
| ▲ | freilanzer 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The RM2 also fails at organizing: no text search in PDFs and not in notes, if you don't convert every handwritten note into text on a new page; only tags, which means if you don't add tags everywhere, you can't find anything by searching; etc. It's extremely expensive for the functionality it offers. | |
| ▲ | dotancohen 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You've probably heard of Org mode. Go look it up - md and a todo app is exactly poor man's Org mode. | | |
| ▲ | volemo 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I’m a big lover of the ecosystem and a heavy Emacs, but after several attempts I couldn’t get into Org mode: (1) it’s too complex and full featured, while my loose mind requires a strict and minimalistic system to be productive; (2) mobile support is quite lacking — yes, there’re beorg and Mobileorg, but they don’t do it for me for one reason or another. So I’ve a custom GTD-like system build using iOS reminders, .md files, and a couple of scripts. | | |
| ▲ | dotancohen 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Yes, or Org mode can be quite complex if you let it be. I mostly only use the same features as markdown supports: headings and code fences. For mobile (Android) I use Orgro. |
| |
| ▲ | jimsimmons 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | does not have paper ergonomics | | |
| ▲ | dotancohen 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Right, I replied to the guy who holds the stance that "paper fails at organizing". |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | GCUMstlyHarmls 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I googled "just paper" thinking it was another device... |
|
|
| ▲ | CGMthrowaway 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >I am happy to be proven wrong but I’m shocked they believe there is a market for this size at all, let alone at $450 I was literally about to order one until I read the comments |
| |
| ▲ | alsetmusic 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Agreed. This is a product I want to own. I've checked in a couple of times over the last year or so, but I genuinely have no use for it. I don't write by hand. When I do, my handwriting is terrible. Even I have trouble making sense of it. It doesn't surprise me at all that they think there's a market for the device at this size (though the price is debatable), assuming it worked quite well. Sounds like that's a bit much to hope for, given OP's experience. Edit: your => OP's | |
| ▲ | freilanzer 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Don't, it's just an expensive replacement for pen and paper, and the best overall pro is that you have your notes in one place. That's it. No text search, etc. make it so much less useful than it could be. |
|
|
| ▲ | llm_nerd 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If you think $450 is a lot, they seriously think they're getting $729 CAD in Canada. On straight conversion is should be $621, not to mention they're almost certainly getting a tariff hit in the US that they don't get in Canada. |
| |
| ▲ | MengerSponge 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Does that price in CAD include sales taxes? Because the US price never does. | | |
| ▲ | llm_nerd 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Good point, and it may. The site oddly claims that "taxes and duties included". But that would be an ill-advised move for them for a couple of reasons. -No Canadian expects that. Our standard is taxes calculated in the final calculation. -Tax rates differ by province. In Alberta it's 5%, while in Ontario it's 13%, for instance. Which is a big reason taxes are calculated in the final calculation. So maybe they think they're simplifying prices, but it's not an advised way to do it it. And the "duties paid" for an electronics vendor is a super weird claim in 2025. | |
| ▲ | dragonmost 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Canada never includes taxes either so that's an extra 10% to 15% for most provinces. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | chrisweekly 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I hear you but would bet heavy you haven't tried using a navigable PDF like hyperpaper.me, which solves most of this frustration. |
| |
| ▲ | beoberha 5 days ago | parent [-] | | For losing the bet, you can pay me the 20 bucks I wasted on hyperpaper ;) It was my last ditch effort to make me use my RM2 but I found it didn’t fit how I wanted to take notes and was still pretty clunky. | | |
| ▲ | funksta 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Hi, hyperpaper creator here– sorry it didn't work for you :( Just curious if there were any problems specifically with the planner, or if it was just the fact that the rM really didn't work for you at all? Always looking to improve it and fill in any gaps in the product. Also when did you try it? Because I will admit the first version was definitely clunky | |
| ▲ | chrisweekly 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Huh. Glad I didn't lose real $. Did you customize your hyperpaper template? I can't quite picture "how [you] wanted to take notes" not being supported, given all the flexibility. shrug |
|
|
|
| ▲ | m463 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I had a remarkable 2. I loved it until I got a pocketbook inkpad lite. Big enought, but with a backlight. and I loved that until amazon killed "download" for kindle books. |
| |
|
| ▲ | al_borland 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I was interested until I saw the price. For a lower price I’d probably risk it and see if/how it might integrate into my life. However, I think it has a high chance of failing to integrate, so $450 is too much to risk. I say this as someone who bought a Daylight tablet for $700 and is now looking to sell it, since I didn’t fit anywhere and it just sits. |
| |
| ▲ | sanilnz 5 days ago | parent [-] | | What were your thoughts on Daylight as a product? | | |
| ▲ | al_borland 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Out of the box I was already disappointed. All their marketing shots showed a knit cover, which I know is a small aesthetic thing, but gave it a certain vibe. I looked all over the site before ordering to try and find confirmation or look at where to order it. I didn’t find it, so assumed it came with it and rolled the dice. It did not. They shipped some puffer jacket style sleeve it could be stored in instead. This was disappointing, as the tactile experience of using it went from something I thought would be the cozy image they were selling, to just another hard plastic tablet. It felt like bait and switch. I reached out to support, and talked to them again I some other forum. They said they updated the site to make it clear, but when I looked it was buried deep in an FAQ and their sales page still showed it in almost all the images (it’s still in a significant number of their marketing images, even though they said they couldn’t make it work). But I felt bad sending it back over that, especially for a new company, so I figured I’d give it a fair shot. I spent some time trying to use the default launcher and figure out its quirks. Eventually I got annoyed with it and installed a more traditional launcher. At this point it just turned into a generic Android tablet with a worse screen. Since I’m in the Apple ecosystem, it was a bit of an island, and generic tablets have never fit well into my workflow, I gave up on the iPad after those sat around too. I did like the pen, mostly because it didn’t require any batteries or charging. The Apple Pencil needing to be changed makes it a non-starter for me, I find that experience to be awful. So props to Daylight for going the battery free route, like a normal pencil or pen would be. The pen alone wasn’t enough for me. I don’t write that many hand written notes. And while I kind of liked that aspect, since it didn’t integrate with my other stuff, it wasn’t something I could really invest in, and wasn’t good enough to find a bunch of new cross platform tools to make it fit. The novelty of the black and white screen wore off quickly. Outside of note taking, a lot of app and websites really lean on color to provide meaningful information that was all lost. The amber backlight I found hard to see, so adjusted it more white. There were some random buttons on the side of the tablet that didn’t seem to do anything. Maybe if I spent more time outdoors my perspective on the screen may have shifted, but I don’t. Overall it was very “meh”, for me. If you want a general purpose tablet, an iPad Air is cheaper and better in almost every way. If you want it black and white, the iPad has a color filter for that. If you want a screen that works in bright sunlight and a pen that doesn’t need a battery, those are the two areas where the Daylight can one-up the iPad, but that person may be more of a Remarkable customer. | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Mistletoe 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It’s just that $449 can buy me so many paper tablets and I really like paper. There’s no subscription for paper, it is tangible, it lasts thousands of years as long as it isn’t burned. I can flip through and see my ideas all in one place that digital files never seem to replicate. |
| |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Same. These tablets have so many features that they are inherently distracting. Just use a pad of paper and a pen or pencil. You’ll save hundreds and be less frustrated. |
|
|
| ▲ | stonecharioteer 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think the sweet spot is 10 inches. I have a Boox Tab Mini C and a Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra. Both feel unweildy for different reasons. For my next tablet I'll get something in 10 inches. I wish Samsung made better options for that size. |
|
| ▲ | LMMojo 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I have a Mobiscribe, which is about this same size. I would like something closer to Letter size, but the smaller size is really handy for handheld use. I can easily hold the Mobiscribe in the palm of my hand and do work (typing on a keyboard, working a screwdriver, pounding my head against a wall) and not have to worry about fumbling my Mobiscribe. Do I think the price point on this Remarkable device is correct? Nope. I wouldn't buy it at this price. |
|
| ▲ | SchemaLoad 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The idea is kind of cool, but just doesn't seem useful enough to justify a very expensive dedicated device. For the same price you could buy both an ipad, a matte screen protector, and a real notepad and pen. The ipad does all of the tech significantly better, and the physical notepad is a more enjoyable physical writing experience. The product seemed to be mostly aimed at tech bros with more money than they know what to do with. |
| |
| ▲ | refulgentis 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | This is quite reductive and sophomorically so - "tech bros" as signifier of moneyed & tasteless? on HN? :) - reMarkable has been around for years, well-reviewed, and rightfully so - it's a quite distinctive experience from "an ipad [with] a matte screen protector." I am not sure I will invest this much, but it's pleasantly surprising to see meaningful advancements in form factor and technology enabled over the longhaul in the products remarkable has made. | | |
| ▲ | freilanzer 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I have one, and I used the ipad alternative that a friend has, and the ipad is just better. I haven't used the RM2 in over a year, since the functionality is just lacking compared to even a paper notebook - which is a ridiculous comparison. | | |
| ▲ | refulgentis 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I suggest you eagerly await their downfall, as you have understood what so many could not: a $3 paper notebook is better. They'll run out of fools, eventually. |
|
| |
| ▲ | noobly 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You won’t be scrolling TikTok on the Remarkable, though. |
|