| ▲ | SebastianKra 7 days ago | |
> Never had issues with the HTML https://github.com/aurelia/binding/issues/108 > I never used Webpack That has little to do with Aurelia, and Aurelia itself integrates with Webpack: https://github.com/aurelia/webpack-plugin > The cool part is Aurelia stuck to web standards, and those “weird mechanisms” were basically polyfills I could agree that Aurelia looks like you’re sticking to standards¹. If you don’t think about it, then everything kinda works 90% of the time. But when you actually try to understand what goes on behind the scenes, like you can with React and Angular, there are just so many footguns, especially around composition and reactivity. Even simple things like passing optional props² or detecting if a <slot> is occupied involved depressing amounts of reverse-engineering. I’ve heard that Aurelia 2 supposedly fixes many of my issues, but I believe the core idea is beyond fixing. React, Solid and others have more powerful approaches that require fewer concepts to understand. ¹ Although there are still tons of custom concepts and syntax to learn. | ||