| ▲ | gandalfgeek 5 days ago | |
The coverage of this has been so bad that the authors have had to put up an FAQ[1] on their website, where the first question is the following: Is it safe to say that LLMs are, in essence, making us "dumber"? No! Please do not use the words like “stupid”, “dumb”, “brain rot”, "harm", "damage", "brain damage", "passivity", "trimming" , "collapse" and so on. It does a huge disservice to this work, as we did not use this vocabulary in the paper, especially if you are a journalist reporting on it. [1]: https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/your-brain-on-chatgpt/ove... | ||
| ▲ | marcofloriano 5 days ago | parent [-] | |
It's actually so safe to say that such a small study like that can point out clearly the fact. But of course, as it is a very sensitive topic, 'the language' and 'the narrative' should be carefully chosen, or you can be 'banned'. Off course we wont see new studies like that anytime soon. | ||