▲ | Herring 5 hours ago | |||||||
The interviews are wrong. Check with your favorite frontier LLM. There has been a lot of research on what's predictive for job performance and what's not, but it's largely ignored. An easy example: Google's "Project Aristotle" - https://psychsafety.com/googles-project-aristotle/ tl;dr: psychological safety was the determining factor of highly effective teams. Then Google goes and does large-scale layoffs. Think about your workplace, do you feel safe? Do you think these interviews help people feel safe? | ||||||||
▲ | Esophagus4 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Great idea. So we’ll do both: have a high bar for technical interviews and a culture of psychological safety. That should be the best of all worlds and create a high performing team. I’m not sure your point here. Yes, high performing teams have psychological safety. | ||||||||
|