▲ | stargrazer 6 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It explicitly says using a single picture. Wouldn't the world become even more expressive if multiple pictures could be added, such as in a photogrammetry scenario? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | btbuildem 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I had the same question! I will have to try this, I have a super edge use case: incomplete bathymetric depth map (lidar boat could not access some areas), coincidentally the most interesting areas are not in the data. My second piece of data is from flyover video (areas of interest where water is also clear enough to see the bottom). With enough video I can mostly remove the water-borne artifacts (ripples, reflections etc) and enhance the river bottom imagery enough to attempt photogrammetric reconstruction. The bottleneck here is that it takes multiple angles to do that, and the visibility through water is highly dependent on the angle of sunlight vs angle of camera. Instead of doing multiple flyovers at different times of day to try and get enough angles for a mesh reconstruction, maybe this can do it relatively well from one angle! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | ilaksh 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There are other models that do that, such as photogrammetry models. But someone could possibly extend the work so it was a few photos rather than one or many. The way you ask the question makes it sound like you think it was a trivial detail they just forgot about. |