|
| ▲ | graemep 8 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Only if it is proved to a criminal standard (i.e. beyond reasonable doubt) to be intended to encourage an act of violence. It it is an expression of anger it is legitimate free speech. |
|
| ▲ | GJim 9 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Your comment has deliberately omitted the context needed for honest discourse. Thus, one can only conclude you are trolling. |
| |
| ▲ | immibis 8 days ago | parent [-] | | So did the one they're replying to. They're just replying like-for-like. It's typical that when someone is arrested for "X action with Y detail" (e.g. buying a knife with intent to kill someone) people who oppose the arrest will only state the X (and for some reason this works). To correct the record when someone says "I don't expect to be arrested for buying a knife", "I do expect to be arrested for planning to a murder" is a correct response. |
|
