Thanks for the feedback. I think you're right, so I changed a bunch of references and updated the description of the processor to 12 core / 24 thread. In some cases, I still think "cores" is the right terminology though, since my OS (confusingly) reports utilization as-if I had 24 cores.

▲

sroussey 6 days ago | parent [-]

Eh, what’s a thread really? It’s a term for us humans.

The difference between two threads and one core or two cores with shared resources?

Nothing is really all that neat and clean.

It more of a 2 level NUMA type architecture with 2 sets of 6 SMP sets of 2.

The scheduler may look at it that way (depending), but to the end user? Or even to most of the system? Nah.

	▲	tgma 6 days ago \| parent [-]
		There are observable differences. For example, under HT, TLB flush or context switch will likely be observable by a neighboring thread whereas for in a full dedicated core, you won't observe such things.