▲ | wiredpancake 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
You are losing braincells relying almost entirely on ChatGPT. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | yamazakiwi 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I'm losing braincells relying on Google Search shoving ad riddled trash in my face and even worse AI results. Gemini frequently just straight up lies to me. Saying the opposite of the truth so frequently I have experienced negative consequences in real life believing it. The only people who are being homogenized or "down-graded" by Chat GPT are people who wouldn't have sought other sophisticated strategies in the first place, and those who understand that Chat GPT is a tool and understand how it works, and it's context, can utilize it efficiently with great positive effect. Obviously Chat GPT is not perfect but it doesn't need to be perfect to be useful. For a search user, Google Search has not been effective for so long it's unbelievable people still use it. That is, if you believe search should be a helpful tool with utility and not a product made to generate maximum revenue at the cost of search experience. Would you say that people were losing braincells using google in 2010 to look up an animal fact instead of going to a library and opening an encyclopedia? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
[deleted] | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | robryan 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Sure you could end up with occasional misinformation, but the speed at which you can get information more than makes up for it. Niche topics that would otherwise take hours or days to pull together and summar ise obscure sources takes minutes with LLMs. |