▲ | torginus 9 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
I've always told people that social credit as used by China was unsed to track dishonest businesses who scammed people and/or other businesses by breaking agreements and not delivering as promised. The fact there's a credit system that protects banks from the people makes it painfully obvious who is in charge of Western society - consider this: You take out a loan to contract the company to build you a house. The company defaults and disappears overnight. The bank is protected automatically but it's up to you have to run after your money yourself. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | skeezyboy 9 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> The bank is protected automatically but it's up to you have to run after your money yourself. oh yeah and whos guaranteeing borrowers for these banks? source would be nice but I bet you dont reply | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | slightwinder 9 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> I've always told people that social credit as used by China was unsed to track dishonest businesses who scammed people and/or other businesses by breaking agreements and not delivering as promised. To be fair, that's the outcome. But there has been attempts to make more problematic, more intrusive, darker versions of this. They just never worked out for technical or ethical/legal reasons. And they made a nice picture to frame the competing culture, darker than they are. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | greyw 9 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
If your borrow money and give it to someone else and that someone else loses it how is it the borrower's fault or even problem? | |||||||||||||||||
|