> Under good Monopoly law, you would remedy the situation that got them to this point, not worry about their future.

I mean but it appears to be being remedy'd by itself why would the court proscribe something for a problem that no longer exists?

▲

stackskipton 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Because it happened. If I was stealing cable but then all shows I wanted to watch switched to streaming, should I be let off the hook because situation remedy'd itself? I'd imagine most people would say no, the fact you can no longer do the crime in the future does not change the fact you did the crime in the past.

	▲	jonas21 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		This is a civil case. The point is to remedy the situation, not to punish a crime.

▲

foolswisdom 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

We don't know at all that AI will actually make Google search moot.