| |
| ▲ | cestith a day ago | parent | next [-] | | The locales package has over 265k installs in the same recent report that lists 231 copies of guix. That’s less than 0.09% or so. | | |
| ▲ | yjftsjthsd-h a day ago | parent [-] | | By the same virtue, https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=firefox only lists 5749 installs of firefox. I'd take it with a grain of salt. | | |
| ▲ | jsight a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Firefox-esr seems to be much more common (~118k): https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=firefox-esr | |
| ▲ | cestith 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Besides the point already made about firefox-esr being the default package for Firefox, here are a couple of other points. First, that also means there are 5749 installations of non-default Firefox compared to 231 of guix. Secondly, popcon works on servers and headless systems without X or Wayland. Those systems still use a package manager, and sometimes several. A graphical web browser like Firefox is unlikely to be installed without a GUI. I’ve seen plenty of systems with Snap, Flatpak, or Nix installed besides the OS-related apt, aptible, apt-get, rpm, yum, dnf, and language-related tools like pip, EasyInstall, rubygems, Bundler, cpanm, npm, cargo, OPAM, Composer, go get, or sbt with no GUI. | |
| ▲ | dspillett a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That is still more than an order of magnitude higher (2.17% rather than 0.09%). And FF ESR is the more common by far (44.5%) as it is the default, people only install the other FF package if they have specific need to be closer to the leading edge. The build environments for the two will be very close, at least compared to the oddities being reported in the Guix requirements, so the hassle of maintaining FF and FF-ESR compared to just one of them is not going to be comparatively large compared to maintaining packages for just one of the pair. | |
| ▲ | Ologn a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It lists 118698 installs of firefox-esr. https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=firefox-esr | | |
| ▲ | omniglottal 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes, and these numbers have been established as what we in the industry call "invalid". |
| |
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
| |
| ▲ | Valodim a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Can't really complain if their usage stats aren't taken into account then, I'd say? | | |
| ▲ | lucb1e a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Or just to take the raw data with a grain of salt because some people care about privacy and haven't had time to read up on what the privacy policy is for example. That doesn't automatically mean these people stop being worth considering as legit users of the software | | | |
| ▲ | 0_gravitas a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's not a complaint, it's just a fact to consider. | |
| ▲ | 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | gorgoiler a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For comparison, git has ~155,000 installs and the common base packages have ~266,000: https://popcon.debian.org/index.html | |
| ▲ | dspillett a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | You just have to assume that the install balance between those with it on is not massively different to the install balance between those who do not. This might not be the safest application of statistics, but it is the best available. If more Guix users want to be seen and counted, to show how much of a need there might be to keep it despite the current issues, then there is a simple thing they can do… Or a less simple thing: the “without a community nor help” part seems rather significant to me in “But the Debian package maintainer has the almost impossible task to backport all the security fixes without a community nor help behind [maintaining it] and as things are going, this will probably lead to the Debian guix package being removed”. |
|
