| ▲ | Chinjut 2 days ago |
| Why do you say it's practically impossible to motivate matrix multiplication? The motivation is that this represents composition of linear functions, exactly as you follow up by mentioning. It's a disservice to anyone to tell them "Well, that's the way it is" instead of telling them from the start "Look, these represent linear functions. And look, this is how they compose". |
|
| ▲ | andrewla 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Sure, that's a way to approach it. All you have to do is stay interested in "linear functions" long enough to get there. It's totally possible -- I got there, and so did many many many other people (arguably everyone who has applied mathematics to almost any problem has). But when I was learning linear algebra all I could think was "who cares about linear functions? It's the simplest, dumbest kind of function. In fact, in one dimension it's just multiplication -- that's the only linear function and the class of scalar linear functions is completely specified by the factor that you multiple by". I stuck to it because that was what the course taught, and they wouldn't teach me multidimensional calculus without making me learn this stuff first, but it was months and years later when I suddenly found that linear functions were everywhere and I somehow magically had the tools and the knowledge to do stuff with them. |
| |
| ▲ | bananaflag 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah, concepts can make a student reject them with passion. I remember in a differential geometry course, when we reached "curves on surfaces", I thought "what stupidity! what are the odds a curve lies exactly on a surface?" | |
| ▲ | ndriscoll 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Linear functions are the ones that we can actually wrap our heads around (maybe), and the big trick we have to understand nonlinear problems is to use calculus to be able to understand them in terms of linear ones again. Problems that can't be made linear tend to be exceptionally difficult, so basically any topic you want to learn is going to be calculus+linear algebra because everything else is too hard. The real payoff though is after you do a deep dive and convince yourself there's plenty of theory and all of these interesting examples and then you learn about SVD or spectral theorems and that when you look at things correctly, you see they act independently in each dimension by... just multiplication by a single number. Unclear whether to be overwhelmed or underwhelmed by the revelation. Or perhaps a superposition. | |
| ▲ | JadeNB 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > But when I was learning linear algebra all I could think was "who cares about linear functions? It's the simplest, dumbest kind of function. In fact, in one dimension it's just multiplication -- that's the only linear function and the class of scalar linear functions is completely specified by the factor that you multiple by". This seems to make it good motivation for an intellectually curious student—"linear functions are the simplest, dumbest kind of function, and yet they still teach us this new and exotic kind of multiplication." That's not how I learned it (I was the kind of obedient student who was interested in a mathematical definition because I was told that I should be), but I can't imagine that I wouldn't have been intrigued by such a presentation! |
|
|
| ▲ | cassepipe 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Agree.The fact that it's just linear functions is what made it click for me |
