▲ | rw_panic0_0 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||
how is it beginner friendly, first paragraph and already an obscure formula for non math people | ||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | cybrox 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
You will never find a level of "beginner friendly" that suits everyone. I agree that this is not an ideal start - at least without any further clarification - for beginners but I think it works well for people that already known mathematical notation but not many specifics of linear algebra. Also, I don't want to be the preacher bringing this into every argument but this is one of the genuinely good uses for AI that I have found. Bringing the beginning of a beginner friendly work down to my level. I can have it explain this if I'm unsure about the specific syntax and it will convey the relevant idea (which is explained in a bit of unnecessary complexity / generality, yes) in simple terms. | ||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | relaxing 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
I agree. I wouldn’t consider someone who has taken (and remembers) a course in set theory a beginner without some added qualifier. One of my pet peeves is using mathematical symbols beyond basic arithmetic without introducing them once by name. Trying to figure out what a symbol is and what branch of math it comes from is extremely frustrating. | ||||||||||||||||||||
|