▲ | account42 5 days ago | |
Possibly, but that would be pretty damning. A license isn't something you should YOLO. If he is that laissez-faire about licensing the source code then what other important aspects of the project has he not given sufficient thought. | ||
▲ | latexr 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
Misunderstanding or failing to predict the legal ramifications of choosing an extremely popular license is in no way an indicator of programming care or ability. They’re different sets of skills. | ||
▲ | sarlalian 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Also, something starts off as a nothingburger side project, so you make some decisions based on that. Then it develops a bit, and turns into something you care about and are able to turn into a business. What people want and expect changes over time, and a license on a codebase that is basically developed by one person, isn't a marriage. |