> I've asked Gemini, so it came up with four primary arguments for this claim, commenting on them briefly:

This line means, and literally says, that everything that follows is a summary or direct quotation from an LLM's output.

There's a more charitable but unintuitive interpretation, in which "commenting on them briefly" is intended to mean "I will comment on them briefly:". But this isn't a natural interpretation. It's one I could be expected to reach only after seeing your statement that 'none of the above is AI.' But even this more charitable interpretation actually contradicts your claim that it's not AI.

So now I'm even less sure I know what you meant to communicate. Either I'm missing something really obvious or the writing doesn't communicate what you intended.