▲ | dboreham 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> no arguments against a virus causing respiratory disease being carried airborne In the US this was not true. Authorities strongly asserted that the virus did not have "airborne" transmission properties, despite numerous people contracting it while locked in their cruise ship cabins. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | hollerith 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This is my recollection, too. Doctors widely believed to be experts in covid would insist in interviews with the mainstream press that people needed to stay 6 feet from each other, but say nothing about the need to wear a good mask while sharing indoor air spaces with other people. (I cannot determine their motivation, but my guess is that they were probably trying to prevent a run on the N95 mask supply.) I was successful in convincing an elderly friend that this advice was wrong and she needed to wear an N95 when inside grocery stores even if she sanitized her hands after every time she touched anything and even if she stayed 6 feet away from people. It took about 12 months for the mainstream narrative to start to say that vulnerable populations should wear N95 masks when indoors with the public. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | arcticfox 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I was so confused by the "no airborne transmission" theory because it seems naive - like you'd need a lot of evidence to convince me that it wasn't the case given the fundamentals of viruses. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
[deleted] |