▲ | Jedd 5 days ago | |||||||
Do you actually need S3-alike? I run distribution [0] / registry [1] as a docker (via Nomad) job, and it just uses a shared nfs mount in my cluster - ie. EXT4 FS underneath. Currently has 12GB and 52 repositories, and is very performant. It's just a file server. Unless your size requirements are huge, the complexity of having your registry rely on a self-hosted S3-alike sounds like a lot of pain for future-muhehe to contend with if / when the S3-alike hiccups. | ||||||||
▲ | muhehe 4 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
For image registry...probably not that much. But it is quite common for other software, often those that target containers/k8s/... I already have few of those and that would be quite handy to have some good local s3. | ||||||||
|