Are you referring to communism? Because that was all about central control - the exact opposite. It was about as cooperative as countries with "democratic" in name are actually democratic.

Don't let a bad implementation ruin a good idea. Instead, look at what specific ways the implementation fails to learn for next time.

▲

whobre 3 days ago | parent [-]

> Don't let a bad implementation ruin a good idea.

It would certainly help to see at least one good implementation of the “good idea”

▲

martin-t 3 days ago | parent [-]

Worker cooperatives:

- A bunch of examples here: https://old.reddit.com/r/cooperatives/comments/p23rxr/what_a...

- Some more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_ownership

- Oxide computer company - idk how exactly the ownership works but AFAIK all workers except sales have the same salary.

- The early idSoftware AFAIK worked similarly with all 4 core gamedevs getting paid the same

Note that nothing says everyone has to get paid the same, it just ends up happening in some examples.

	▲	CactusBlue 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		I'd say Oxide is the exact opposite, in that they have the same base salary but they vary compensation by adjustment of equity