| ▲ | NewJazz 3 days ago |
| Yes, all archivers speculate that the original source of information will at some point become unavailable. On a long time horizon, they have often been correct. |
|
| ▲ | timr 3 days ago | parent [-] |
| OK, so you're speculating. |
| |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Sure, in the same sense you're speculating that they don't have a time machine to prove their point. Not all speculation is of equal value. | | |
| ▲ | timr 3 days ago | parent [-] | | > Sure, in the same sense you're speculating that they don't have a time machine to prove their point. That's called: I'm stating a current fact, and you're imagining a future that doesn't exist. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 3 days ago | parent [-] | | No, you're speculating that the parent poster can't prove it with their time machine. That is a reasonable form of speculation. As was the parent poster's speculation. |
|
|
|