| ▲ | fidotron a day ago |
| I think it's time for us to go back to having mobile phones (texting, virtual credit cards, tethered wifi hotspots etc). separate from mobile storage and compute (mp3 players, cameras etc.). The modern mobile ecosystem is selling games consoles when the nerds want mobile Unix workstations. |
|
| ▲ | dotancohen a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| Find a dumb phone that: 1. Presents a mobile hotspot, and
2. Supports CardDAV so I can actually sync my contacts
3. Records calls
There were none the last time I tried, about three years ago. And that even ignores the issue of trying to dial a number from a link on a web page or in a document. |
| |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese a day ago | parent | next [-] | | It’s so strange that out of the box CalDAV and CardDAV support is rare for mobile devices. iPhones are the best somehow, with Android being heavily Google-focused and support is totally absent on non-smart platforms, which is the perfect opposite of what one might expect! It’d make way more sense if the more open platforms were built around open standards, but somehow here we are. | | |
| ▲ | xethos 20 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's "rare" in that Apple, BlackBerry / RIM, and (seemingly, though I never used it) Windows Mobile all supported it. It was only ever Google that didn't The fact they now make up half the market is what makes it rare, not that other mobile OS' didn't make it available |
| |
| ▲ | omnimus a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I am not 100% sure but my partner has the nokia “bannana” phone and i think it supports both. It for sure supports 4g hotspot and caldav but i think even carddav. Kinda sad that it's KaiOS the FirefoxOS fork. One can only wonder what would have happened if Mozilla kept with the project till now. There is huge wave of people wanting less absorbing devices nowdays. | |
| ▲ | numpad0 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There was a multiple years of gap between rollout of voice call specification on LTE(VoLTE) and launches of first featurephone operating system supporting it. Android and iOS were only implementation available for a while. For this reason, practically all "featurephone" style phones that supports voice call, except very few, runs AOSP. At the point where your product runs AOSP, you might as well launch it as a low end smartphone, which is what a lot of vendor do. | |
| ▲ | AJ007 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I suspect the solution may be a compact tablet running a touch-friendly Linux distro, and the "phone" is just a mobile hotspot. If you want some fantastic camera built in, that's a separate problem. I've been more neutral about this in the past, but the current and future integration of LLMs (and other ML models) into the base operating system will mean these mobile phones do less of what the user wants and more of what the user does not want. Secondly, Apple is in the process of becoming an adtech company and will not provide an alternative to Google. Thirdly, Google may be forced to divest Android and the mobile business. If so, the buyer is likely to be as bad, or worse, because they'll have to figure out how to pay for the whole thing. | |
| ▲ | ajdude a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For a couple years I used the TCL Flip as a phone and mobile hotspot for my iPod touch. I'm pretty sure KaiOS supports CardDAV. | |
| ▲ | baq a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Presents a mobile hotspot I guess you can get a mobile hotspot and a dumb phone separately. Looks like 5G Wifi 6 APs are available for ~$100. | |
| ▲ | drnick1 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | The dipshits at Apple and Google don't provide what should be a built in feature (recording calls) and make it difficult to add it through third party software. At this point, iOS and Android are actively working against the user. |
|
|
| ▲ | Almondsetat a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The ratio between nerds and "normal" consumers is pretty high, and being a nerd does not automatically mean you care about having a "mobile unix workstation" (what unix-worthy work can you actually do on a phone?), and even if you have one it doesn't mean you'll actually find a use for it. It's safe to say that the market is irrelevant, and, unlike things like woodworking, boutique manyfacturers can't really exist in this space |
| |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese a day ago | parent | next [-] | | I don’t really care to do any task traditionally associated with full fat computers directly on my phone, simply because the input methods are extremely poor for that kind of thing. If my phone could act like an ultrabook/netbook when hooked up to a screen and proper desktop input on the other hand (similar to DeX, iPadOS 26, and the forthcoming baseline Android desktop mode), that’s a more interesting proposition and probably one that a number of more typical users would find interesting too. For example, university students whose main use for a computer is editing documents could comfortably get by with nothing but a nice-ish phone, a monitor, and a Bluetooth KB+mouse. | | |
| ▲ | Almondsetat a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Google is said to be in the process of unifying Android and ChromeOs (which can run Linux programs), so your wishes are not that irrealistic (especially since DeX has been around for a while now) | | |
| ▲ | chrisweekly a day ago | parent [-] | | cool, good to know also, FYI (and for the sake of non-native English readers), it's "unrealistic". ["irrealistic" relates to irrealism, a literary technique that departs from reality] |
| |
| ▲ | _shantaram a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | this thing was so far ahead of its time https://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Asus-PadFone-Smartphone... if it came out today with say 16gb of RAM and used the new Android VM feature I would buy it instantly | | |
| ▲ | doubled112 a day ago | parent [-] | | I had an Asus TF700 tablet which had HDMI out and a keyboard dock/touchpad probably about 10 years ago. It could have been a decent concept if the Tegra 3 chipset wasn’t a little underpowered and the onboard storage so slow. On new stuff, a Bluetoothu keyboard and mouse more or less solve input, and USB-C should solve video out (and input if you want). Modern phones should be powerful enough for basic desktop use, I just don’t think people want it. |
| |
| ▲ | fsflover 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > If my phone could act like an ultrabook/netbook when hooked up to a screen You just described Librem 5. | | |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | The only problem is its hardware, which even a 5+ year old ultraportable laptop soundly beats and wouldn’t make for a very good desktop experience. The StarLabs tablet would be much better suited here, but it’s also 12.5” which is so large that you may as well just get a laptop with more power and better battery life. |
|
| |
| ▲ | yjftsjthsd-h a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > what unix-worthy work can you actually do on a phone? I do most of my light/routine server management via SSH from my phone, plus keeping a version control checkout of my documents that I do actually work on in vim (yes, the limited keyboard is annoying but it's fine for light work). At a previous job, the former extended quite far; I could get paged in the middle of the night, connect to the VPN, SSH into the server, triage, and frequently diagnose and even fix the problem without having to actually get out of bed. | | |
| ▲ | Almondsetat a day ago | parent [-] | | But in that case all that you need is a pocketable PC with linux that can sit on your nightstand, especially since doing work-related stuff on your personal smartphone seems dangerous | | |
| ▲ | Telaneo a day ago | parent | next [-] | | > especially since doing work-related stuff on your personal smartphone seems dangerous As compared to your personal laptop? Or is the 'personal' qualifier that makes you say that? | | | |
| ▲ | yjftsjthsd-h a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | > But in that case all that you need is a pocketable PC with linux that can sit on your nightstand, ...A smartphone, yes. > especially since doing work-related stuff on your personal smartphone seems dangerous It was my work phone, not my personal phone. |
|
| |
| ▲ | esseph a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I've rebuilt Linux servers with my phone from multiple countries over. I've also reconfigured BGP speaking routers with it. | | |
| ▲ | cft a day ago | parent [-] | | I have also fixed live bugs in vim from my Android phones, starting from 2014. Controlled BGP enabled switches too. Fixed database replication issues. |
| |
| ▲ | davidw a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > unix-worthy work can you actually do on a phone They're more powerful than plenty of computers from not too long ago | | |
| ▲ | gloxkiqcza a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Apple is rumored to release a MacBook with an iPhone 16 Pro SOC this year. | |
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | skybrian a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you interpret “this space” a little more broadly, there are boutique manufacturers catering to hackers that sell tiny, cheap, wearable computers. Check out all the stuff Adafruit sells. | |
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | throwaway106382 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Here you go: https://www.punkt.ch/en/products/mp02-4g-mobile-phone/ |
| |
|
| ▲ | bapak a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The nerds are the minority. If you want hackable machines vote with your wallet and/or with your politicians. |
|
| ▲ | mathiaspoint a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Modem Manager on Linux handles ppp and texting (even MMS if you're willing to build mmsd which isn't easy) with just a USB modem. You don't need a phone at all. All phones have these days is "the app ecosystem" which is designed and optimized just to rent you out to corporations. Exposing yourself to it is almost always a loss. |
| |
| ▲ | mbac32768 a day ago | parent [-] | | Do you actually carry around a Linux laptop with a USB modem instead of a smartphone? Can you blog about it? | | |
| ▲ | mathiaspoint 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes I do. I don't really maintain a blog but I've been thinking about writing some articles on my personal site about how I have everything set up. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | zahlman a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > time for us to go back I never left. Well, my flip phones have had cameras in them, but. On the other hand, "virtual credit card"? What?? And what good is proper "mobile storage and compute" if I don't at least have a laptop-sized screen and a proper physical input device? |
|
| ▲ | butz a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's finally time for Palm Pilot to shine again. |
|
| ▲ | rafram a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That wouldn’t sell. Who wants to buy two devices with more or less the same hardware when they could buy just one? |
| |
| ▲ | rs186 a day ago | parent [-] | | This. Apple stopped selling all iPod hardware, including iPod touch, for a reason. |
|
|
| ▲ | superkuh a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Especially since the mobile phone part legally can never be owned or controlled by the human person. Only corporations can own and use the baseband computer/modem because only they have bought the spectrum license rights and built out the infrastructure to justify it to the FCC. Similar situations exist in other countries. This legal reality is showing itself more and more in the practicalities of actual using "smartphones". The only real solution is what op said, make the modem completely separate from the computing device. |
|
| ▲ | pharrington a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Nope. Its time to have full ownership over our handheld computers. |
| |
| ▲ | fidotron a day ago | parent | next [-] | | This isn't going to happen. You won't have modern mobile banking or cellular communications in a device without binary blobs or "trusted" compute modules you cannot inspect. | | |
| ▲ | ulrikrasmussen a day ago | parent | next [-] | | That's a lie. Banking apps work fine on desktop browsers with dedicated security tokens such as smart cards or code displays. My banking app runs on GrapheneOS, but my national identity app which it uses for authorization and authentication doesn't. Luckily the national identity supports hardware tokens, so it just means I have to scan an NFC token in my pocket instead of scanning my fingerprint in the identity app. | | |
| ▲ | consp a day ago | parent [-] | | Banking apps also work fine on rooted phones which mask most common "detect root" schemes. Don't install sudo for instance, my banking app barked when I did that, removed it and it was fine again (they use the cheap package from one of the many obfuscation firms) |
| |
| ▲ | pharrington a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | There are billions of computer users across the world, but only 100 or so technobarons who want full control over our computers. Full ownership absolutely can happen. It was the standard for a couple decades in the past, and it can be the standard again in the future. | | |
| ▲ | bonoboTP a day ago | parent [-] | | It was the standard when it didn't matter and was just a hobby thing for nerds or academics. Now it's "serious stuff" with billions of regular users who use it for real life stuff. | | |
| ▲ | pharrington a day ago | parent [-] | | Without having evidence, for or against your point, I'll confidently say both that you're wrong (about the just for nerds/academics thing), and that mainstream computer use makes demanding full ownership even more important. | | |
| ▲ | bonoboTP a day ago | parent [-] | | You wrote "It was the standard for a couple decades", I'm saying that was so because the stakes were lower, it didn't reach the attention threshold of important enough people who can lobby effectively. Also the zeitgeist is no longer where it was in the 90s and 00s. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | echelon a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This. It's time for an antitrust breakup of Google (and Apple). These two companies control mobile computing like a dictatorship. This is a sector where most people do all of their computing. This isn't gaming or a plaything - it's most people's lives and trillions of dollars of business activity. All gatekept by two companies. Here's what needs to happen: 1. We need government mandated web installs of native apps without scare walls ("this app is dangerous and may delete your files") and enabled by default without labyrinthine settings to enable. 2. We need the ability to do payments and user signups without Google or Apple's platform pieces. We should not be forced to lock ourselves into their ecosystems. 3. Google search and Chrome cannot be the defaults on mobile platforms. We need the EU-mandated browser / search picker. 4. First party applications should not be treated as first class while third parties are left to dry. Google and Apple should not be allowed to install their platform components by default - a user must seek them out. 5. No more green text / blue text bubbles. All messaging must be multi-platform and equivalent with no favoritism. 6. Google and Apple wallets should not be the defaults, but rather the user should have the ability to configure their bank, PayPal, Cash App, or whatever payment provider they choose. | |
| ▲ | garciasn a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | There are options out there for you to do this. Hell, build your own. That’s what nerds did long ago. Keep up the same effort today. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | | |
| ▲ | ori_b a day ago | parent | next [-] | | There's a lot of effort going into making it impossible to interact with the rest of the world if you run your own code. Look up remote attestation. | | |
| ▲ | garciasn a day ago | parent [-] | | Linux changed the landscape of Unix. We can do it with phones too. The defeatist attitude, while potentially true, didn’t land us where we are today server side. | | |
| ▲ | ThrowawayR2 a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Linux was a one-time anomaly in a much simpler, wilder era without overwhelmingly dominant incumbents in the spaces that Linux eventually took over. | |
| ▲ | saulpw a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Linux was created in 1993, when the computing world was still understandable by a single human. This is no longer the case, hence why we haven't seen any new (hacker) operating systems since then. | |
| ▲ | ori_b a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | A purely technical solution is insufficient. Put on your suit and prepare to play politics. |
|
| |
| ▲ | echelon a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | > There are options out there for you to do this. That's like the tiny moments of freedom that Winston Smith has in 1984 before he is captured and tortured. We live in a mobile computing dictatorship. There isn't time, money, or energy for millions of people to do this. And so we are taxed, corralled, and treated like cattle. Google and Apple own smartphones and nobody can do anything about it. The only solution is government dismantlement of the Google/Apple monopoly. That starts with mandates for web installs of native apps by default, without hidden settings menus or scare walls. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | TheRealPomax a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Or, and hear me out this is going to sound crazy: we finally stop pretending that we're using phones. When was the last time anyone actually used their "mobile phone" for actual real phone calls to a phone number that wasn't "phone support because the company involved is so ancient or dark patterned that they only offer phone support"? Or voluntarily initiated sending a text message, rather than using email or messenger software? So how about we just stop making "mobile phones" and just sell what they are: pocket computers. And that name immediately tells legislators what's appropriate hardware control, namely: none. If you buy a pocket computer, you can now do with that computer whatever you want, and the company that makes the hardware has no say over that, and the company that makes the OS has no legal basis for locking you out of anything. And if those are the same company, then the EU can finally go "how about no, you get to break up or you will never sell anything in our market again". |
| |
| ▲ | saulpw a day ago | parent | next [-] | | > When was the last time anyone actually used their "mobile phone" for actual real phone calls I called my mom yesterday (to her landline), and then I sent a text message to my friend from a parking lot to let them know I'd be there soon. | |
| ▲ | queenkjuul a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | 99% of my communications are SMS/MMS and while i do avoid phone calls my friend called me yesterday, and i called a business to ask about their holiday hours this weekend. And it's all LTE, your pocket computer needs a network whether you use SMS or some IP messenger. Therefore carriers get involved, and they make horrifying demands of users and manufacturers. But yeah, i don't want a phone, i want a pocket computer with VoLTE |
|