▲ | 1vuio0pswjnm7 8 days ago | |
China's use of SNI-based censorship is well-documented For example, see | ||
▲ | 1vuio0pswjnm7 7 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
China has blocked ESNI https://gfw.report/blog/gfw_esni_blocking/en/ But SNI is not CH and ESNI is not ECH Will China block ECH ECH blocking has been detected in Russia https://github.com/net4people/bbs/issues/417 According to Niere et al. (2025) "Additionally, with the ECH extension not yet being widely used [17], [71] and focusing on privacy protection rather than censorship circumvention [60], it can be censored easily by blocking it entirely [14], [76]." The paper describes various GFW bypass methods that currently work, including removing the SNI extension entirely It does not mention anyone using ECH to bypass GFW Perhaps it is too early to conclude "China blocks ECH" because ECH is not in widespread use | ||
▲ | ranger_danger 7 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Yes, but SNI is not ECH. |