This definitely adds a grain of salt, but as far as I can tell, none of that shows in the article, especially in the final paragraphs explaining how the elitist system is overall bad for the country. But it does make me wonder about possible hidden flaws in the methodology (I'm still confused at some of the earlier statistics contradicting the claims made later)

▲

avs733 5 days ago | parent [-]

> Yet another possibility is that Romania has an undersampled ethnic group that overperforms, but whose schools aren’t tested very well. The only group this might be is Romanian Jews and using them as an explanation is problematic for two reasons. The first is that there are too few to realistically explain Romanian Olympiad performance. The second is that we know the identities of Olympiad participants from Romania, and they don’t seem to be Jewish.

This struck me as…odd…before I even saw the parent comment.

▲

ivan_gammel 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

This one is not odd and was worth mentioning before rejecting. Just look at American IMO team of 2024, in which most team members have Asian ancestry - some ethnic groups may indeed perform better than others. Picking Jews for this matter wasn’t unreasonable if you know the history of Eastern Europe.

▲

saagarjha 4 days ago | parent [-]

This is not because people with Asian ancestry are smarter.

	▲	ivan_gammel 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Who said they are smarter?

▲

_alternator_ 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The general vibe of this magazine: support mainstreaming of eugenics ideas (and now eigenicists), the ubermensch / great man theory of history, and other ideas that we’ve largely shied away from for the last 75 years.

	▲	avs733 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		And cloak it in layers of language so that a quick read doesn’t catch it. It’s like human prompt poisoning.