[flagged]

The only way I can understand you coming to that conclusion is if you assumed that's what they were going to be and didn't actually read any of them.

No it doesn't. The only negative comments are about the cringey presentation.

I spend a lot of time post-training models to rid them of their "default alignment", I'd have loved if this did something interesting, but reading the technical report I get the impression they spent more effort on the branding than the actual model.

What I'm wondering is honestly if they post-trained Llama 3 405B again because they don't care enough to figure out a new post-training target or if it was a realization they'd get worse-than-baseline performance out of any recent release with their current approach.