| ▲ | Kranar 7 days ago |
| There is no black hole that is a perfect sphere. That would, at a minimum, require a body with absolutely no angular momentum which isn't in anyway feasible. Any rotating/spinning black hole will no longer be a perfect sphere. |
|
| ▲ | gpm 7 days ago | parent [-] |
| Yeah but if you look down the axis of rotation you will have a perfect (to many decimal places anyways) circle... which was the demand. |
| |
| ▲ | Dylan16807 7 days ago | parent | next [-] | | That might be right. But even then, the biggest black hole we think is possible measured down to the planck length gives you a number with 50 digits. And the entire observable universe measured in planck lengths is about 60 digits. So how are you going to get a physical pi of even a hundred digits on the path toward arbitrary precision? | |
| ▲ | andrewla 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > to many decimal places anyway > > The idea of arbitrary precision is intrinsically broken in physical reality. There is no contradiction here. | | |
| ▲ | gpm 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Yeah I was just responding to the 64bit float thing, people overestimate floats. |
|
|