▲ | 1vuio0pswjnm7 5 days ago | |
"...can tell you in the real world - essentially zero AI rollout in accounitng world for anything serious." The jobs the reseearchers concluded were affected were "unregulated" ones where there are no college education or professional certification requirements, e.g.,
"Not sure what these guys are studying..."Apparently, they studied payroll data from ADP on age, job title and headcount together with, who would have guessed, data from an AI company (Anthropic) https://digitaleconomy.stanford.edu/publications/canaries-in... This study has not been peer-reviewed | ||
▲ | 0xdde 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
It should also be noted that there are some pretty big flaws in the analysis. They mention "the distribution of firms using ADP services does not exactly match the distribution of firms across the broader US economy," but make no attempt to adjust their analysis for it. They also drop 30% of the data for which there is no job title recorded. With such a skewed sample, it's hard to tell how the analysis is supposed to generalize. | ||
▲ | tracker1 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
This seems to assign a cause without merit other than AI is the buzzword of the day. Receptionist jobs down.. this has been the case for a while, and does include some AI, but AVR and general speech recognition and matching has gotten pretty good for a while, I'd say AI is half a step back. Translators, maybe AI, but again, speech recognition in general is pretty good and not strictly an AI thing... but I'll give that one credit. Software Engineers, maybe it's more about the (I don't even know the right current FAANG acronym anymore) companies that have laid off tens of thousands in the past few years and largely replaced (if at all) them with either contract or h1b workers? Only to grow short term margins on already profitable companies. |