|
| ▲ | badsectoracula 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| > intention to cripple opportunities for Western LLM providers to capitalize on investments. Western LLM providers release open weight models too (e.g. Mistral). |
|
| ▲ | adastra22 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Open weights is the equivalent of open source here. DeepSeek is open weight. If you have some reason to believe a different definition should be used, please provide it. Because there is no source code here. |
|
| ▲ | echelon 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > cripple opportunities for Western LLM Good! If they're not open, they're creating more lock-in. And on top of that, they're using information they don't own to do so and then renting it back to us. |
| |
| ▲ | numpad0 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I 100% support it as a consumer :P but IMO we do have to be aware that it's just a happy coincidence. |
|
|
| ▲ | ttrotcre6454 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Do you realize how silly you sound ? "Linux was a Finish conspiracy to cripple hard-working US operating systems makers. It's not really open because I don't understand it." Leave nationalism to those who want to use you as mere pawns in their imaginary Chess game. |
| |
| ▲ | numpad0 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I don't care as long as it doesn't sound sillier than to call them open source. They're literally binaries. Often lossy compressed, even. |
|
