▲ | Deuter8 4 days ago | |||||||||||||
Early on in Bitcoin's life, Satoshi had a clear plan for increasing blocksize as necessary, but you went and screwed that up with your buddies. Hope it was worth it for you per$onally. OGs will never forget. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | skeezyboy 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Tell Satoshi hes a numpty. How could he not forsee the issues inherent in his design? | ||||||||||||||
▲ | nullc 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
What an interesting flashback-- as of the last three days I'm starting to see again this sort of strange offtopic harassment following me around the internet. In any case, what Satoshi remarks were you referring to? Perhaps his last related to the subject? > Piling every proof-of-work quorum system in the world into one dataset doesn't scale. [...] Bitcoin users might get increasingly tyrannical about limiting the size of the chain so it's easy for lots of users and small devices https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28917#msg289... I stopped working on some Bitcoin seven years ago after being burned out by harassment, threats, and an a literal trillion dollars worth hateful of vexatious litigation eating up my time. After all that I'm not intimidated by you. I reject your absurd accusations, but if they were true by this time you have only yourself to blame. If whatever you thought should have been done was doable and valuable, why didn't you do it and why isn't anyone using it? I certainly didn't stop you. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | bloatedGoat 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Source? In any case, a fork of Bitcoin with bigger blocks has existed for years and the market doesn't prefer it despite all the big names and companies hyping it up at the time of the split. Satoshi left Bitcoin so there wouldn't be an appeal to authority so maybe your argument isn't as strong as you think it is. | ||||||||||||||
|