Earnest question: why not? I would think "option to prove who you are and guarantee not to be impersonated" is a pretty broadly appealing capability except to people trying to do the impersonating.

▲

skeezyboy 4 days ago | parent [-]

>"option to prove who you are and guarantee not to be impersonated"

guaranteed as long as no attacker gets hold of the private key, which cannot be guaranteed

▲

estearum 4 days ago | parent [-]

Yeah, I don't find this to be a compelling argument at all.

That's an argument against all authentication anywhere.

▲

skeezyboy 4 days ago | parent [-]

> That's an argument against all authentication anywhere.

its a problem isnt it

	▲	estearum 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		No