There is power management for HDDs, you know...

For my typical usage, the hard drives are probably more than 80% in sleep mode. If I had more SATA ports, I could probably add a frequent-access cache on a SSD and then they would be 99% sleeping.

The drives I have, ST2000DL003, consume 0.5W in sleep, according to the spec sheet. So all 8 of them would consume ~4W.

▲

SirMaster 5 days ago | parent [-]

If you care that much about power why are you using 8 tiny 2TB HDDs instead of 1 or 2 big HDDs?

You don't need a NAS for 16TB, you just need a RasPi with a 16TB USB HDD connected to it and a second one for backups that you keep mostly offline.

	▲	nine_k 5 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		In a RAID6 with 8 drives, you can allow one disk to go offline and remain able to write, or two disks offline and remain able to still read 100% of data. You lose 2 of 8 = 25% capacity on redundancy. With a mirror of 2 disks, if one disk dies, you can still read; if two disks die, you're toast. And you lose 1 of 2 = 50% of capacity on redundancy. A quite different balance.
	▲	M95D 5 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Because TCO is less with these cheap old drives and I can have RAID5 instead of just RAID1 or no RAID at all. But you're right. In a few years it will become advantageous to switch to a couple of larger HDDs. I could probably do it right now, but I don't yet trust these new drives as much as I trust the old ones, especially since the refurbished scandal.