There are guides on how to mainline Synology NAS's to run up-to-date debian on them

https://forum.doozan.com/list.php

jauntywundrkind 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

People seem very attracted to Synology because it requires very little thought & effort.

FWIW the new Ugreen NAS run Debian. I don't know a ton about it, but it's be great if they could stay a little more up to date. This Synology story with ancient forks & weird encryption sounds truly bogus.

▲

tetris11 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

I'm attracted to them because you can find them secondhand on ebay for very cheap, and their power draw / performance ratio is quite decent compared to other systems.

I will say that the Ugreen NAS seems to offer more performance for less watts, so it's definitely something I will keep an eye on in the future if it pops up on Ebay.

> This Synology story with ancient forks & weird encryption sounds truly bogus.

It's not. My Synology is running Linux kernel v4, and I opted to use their "SHR" RAID configuration and can confirm that it's some weird BTRFS variant that is likely deadlocked due to the kernel.

The encrypted volumes I've made also look very much like the EcryptFS files I've been seeing on other setups.

I'm currently in the process of mainlining it to kernel v6 to reap the better power and idle / hibernation rewards, as well as just using a standard Ext4 FS with updates

	▲	ValentineC 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		> It's not. My Synology is running Linux kernel v4, and I opted to use their "SHR" RAID configuration and can confirm that it's some weird BTRFS variant that is likely deadlocked due to the kernel. SHR is mostly MD-RAID and LVM, and works with ext4 too.

▲

import 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I have a Ugreen, just got the latest update runs on kernel 6.12

▲

layer8 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

If you want to run Debian instead of DSM, you have a much wider choice of NAS hardware than just Synology.