▲ | gf000 4 days ago | |
I'm looking forward to your experience with this approach! Bit off topic, but is there any particular reason you went with a go-like `ident type` syntax over the more common ones like the C or the ML one? | ||
▲ | thomasmg 4 days ago | parent [-] | |
> any particular reason you went with a go-like `ident type` syntax I just think that ":" is unnecessary. In my language, the type is mostly used in function declarations and types, eg.
What would be the advantage of adding ":"? |