▲ | londons_explore 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
> Audit quality will continue to suffer I wonder how much this actually matters? I understand that for an auditor, having a quality reputation matters. But if all audits from all firms are bad, how much would the world economy suffer? Likewise for the legal profession, if all judges made twice the number of mistakes, how much would the world suffer? | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | drusepth 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> Likewise for the legal profession, if all judges made twice the number of mistakes, how much would the world suffer? Is this hyperbole? It seems like the real question being asked here is "would the world be worse off without deterministic checks and balances", which I think most people would agree is true, no? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | cjbgkagh 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The current system is not long term stable, and poor accounting is part of the reason more people don't know that. Even worse accounting would speed up the decline. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | fibers 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Then you would have to think twice about the company you may be giving money to (ie the stock market and private bank loans). That's the whole objective of this. Every company is going to need an accountant in one way or another and you don't really need to follow strict GAAP for management requirements (what else is EBIDTA for if anything?), but it's something completely different than saying: I made x dollars and spent y dollars, here is what I have and what I owe, please give me money. At the end of the day it is a question of convenience/standards, if GAAP didn't exist maybe firms could use a modified accrual standard that is wholly compliant with tax reporting and that's it. |