Cigarette filters do nothing for health and create plastic pollution

The article cited [0] discusses ventilated filters, not all filters. It is a dodge for regulator's smoking machines.

Since I think people are going to smoke a better solution would be mandated biodegradable filters. Unfiltered cigarettes must be worse for smokers than filtered cigarettes. Unless the filter material itself is dangerous :)

[0] https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/109/12/djx075/3836090

	▲	stefantalpalaru 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		> Unfiltered cigarettes must be worse for smokers than filtered cigarettes. You'd think so, but no. "Cigarette filters are believed by many to reduce the health risks of smoking. This article outlines the history of the technology of filters and discusses the impacts of these cigarette design features and their regulation. We conducted a literature review to assess the impacts of this technology. The results show that filters were initially developed for aesthetic purposes and later improved and marketed as a harm reduction technology. The most widely-used filters are those made of cellulose acetate with or without activated carbon. Despite smokers’ beliefs and advertising claims, filters have no health benefits and filter tip ventilation can increase the health risks of smoking. Filters can also make cigarettes more appealing and cause significant environmental impacts. Cigarette filters have no health benefits and lull smokers into a false sense of security and should therefore be banned." - ["Health without filters: the health and environmental impacts of cigarette filters" (2021)](https://www.scielo.br/j/csc/a/k7CJ3Wvq3yMLSmmmwT89cPw/?lang=...)