▲ | whatshisface 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Why is that? It seems like multiple cores requesting the same address would be easier for the MMU to fetch for, not harder. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | recursivecaveat 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Not necessarily the exact same address (you can fix that in a program anyways with a broadcast tree), but same memory bank. Imagine 1000 trains leaving a small town at the same time, instead of 1000 trains leaving 1000 different towns simultaneously. At some point there are not enough transportation resources to get stuff out of a particular area at the parallelism desired. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | reliabilityguy 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It’s not that the fetching is the problem, but serving the data to many cores at the same time from a single source. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | qrios 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
This is not my domain, but I assume the MMUs acting like a switch and something like multicast is not available here. I‘ve tried to implement such on a FPGA and it was extremely cost intensiv. |