He means that they are cash flow negative if you discount all government income and at the same time include all costs with those launches :P

▲

avmich 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

> He means that they are cash flow negative if you discount all government income and at the same time include all costs with those launches :P

That would be a strange evaluation.

	▲	boxed 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		I've seen worse from SpaceX haters. I've had a "conversation" here on HN by someone who claimed that SpaceX doesn't land boosters anymore for example. Conspiracy theories basically.

▲

iwontberude 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Bingo they aren’t anywhere near the solution to return the investment and will be raising debt or begging for more government money. They will be (progressively) nationalized to justify the additional cash infusions to keep the mission from being a complete failure. NASA wants their moon base I guess.