IMO, overseeing 0 people is great. I'm not likely to take any position where I have to oversee more or less than that; although I'm willing to compromise and oversee one person where they're actually independent and I don't have to do much overseeing.

▲ pmontra 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

I'm sure that some company has managers overseeing imaginary and complex people.

▲ LambdaComplex 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> overseeing 0 people is great. I'm not likely to take any position where I have to oversee more or less than that;

I would have so many questions if I got an offer for a position where I had to oversee less than 0 people

▲ fuzzy_biscuit 5 days ago | parent [-]

Would that mean you have to undersee one or more people? cue rimshot

	▲	shoo 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		`Up on the shore they work all day Out in the sun they slave away While we devotin' Full time to floatin' Under the sea`

▲ omoikane 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Overseeing 0 people is great if your role is an individual contributor. If your role is a manager and there is no one for you to manage, it would seem that your role is redundant.