▲ | kube-system 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
That's the reality of low-volume products, they're expensive. Most people dropping that much cash on NAND will just drop the cash to plug it into something that can access it quickly. If you want big slow storage for cheap, just get a spinning disk. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | aidenn0 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Random IOPS through a SATA interface is orders of magnitude faster on NAND vs a spinning disk. A SATA SSD and a spinning disk might as well be two completely different categories of device for any non-sequential workload. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|