▲ | ath3nd 2 days ago | |||||||
I got 10 upvotes on my first answer, and 4 on the next one, how many did you have? Maybe not everyone is so enthusiastic to reduce their skill level while simultaneously lining the pockets of our corporate overlords? Have you considered that you are in the wrong, and that's why you are irrationally triggered by people questioning your stance? The science is clear: you start cognitively declining the more you use LLMs: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/mit-study-finds-artifi... The current research on experienced developers (be mindful this study is on experienced developers so if your mileage varies, take a second look at the word experienced) shows that their performance also declines by roughly 19% while using LLMs. https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-o... So, you are deskilling yourself while at the same time producing less than before and wasting money and burning resources, for what? I already can see the opportunity for a business for those of us who didn't get our brains rotted by the overuse of LLMs, to fix the messes created by "engineers" using LLMs. | ||||||||
▲ | Cheer2171 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
You keep not responding to the actual point I am making. I made a specific point with an example about LLM generated commit messages. You keep tilling at imaginary windmills. I'm done. You clearly need therapy. And citing up votes? Without controlling for how votes are also a function of time since posting and depth of reply thread? | ||||||||
|