I would kindly ask you to re-read my post again.

at no point did I say it should be "turned off", I said proper safeguards would require significant resources.

The kid exhibited long term behaviours, rather than idle curiosity. Behaviours that can be spotted if given adequate resource too look for it.

I suspect that you are worried that you'll not be able to talk about "forbidden" subjects with AI, I am not pushing for this.

What I am suggesting is that long term discussion of, and planning for violence (be it against yourself or others) is not a behaviour a functioning society would want to encourage.

"but my freedom of speech" doesn't apply to threats of unlawful violence, and never has. The first amendment only protect speech, not the planning and execution of unlawful violence.

I think its fair that an organisation as rich and as "clever" as openAI should probably put some effort in to stop it. After all, if someone had done the same thing but with the intent of killing someone in power, this argument would be less at the forefront