> We are living in such a horrific moment. We need these things to be legislated. Punished. We need to stop treating them as magic. They had the tools to prevent this. They had the tools to stop the conversation. To steer the user into helpful avenues.

No, no, no and no.

ChatGPT wasn't the source of his desire to end his life, nor was it the means to do it. It was a "person" to talk to, since he had no such real people in his life.

Let's absolve everyone else of blame and hold ChatGPT solely responsible. Yeah, right.

Not his genes, upbringing, parents, peers, or school — it's just ChatGPT. Your own attempt at ending your life hasn't seemingly taught you anything.

I clearly didn't claim that. My own depression was multifaceted, stemming from genetics, upbringing, social isolation. And the help I got was also multifaceted and involved identifying all those causes.

Does it not give you pause when you write things like "it's just ChatGPT. Your own attempt at ending your life hasn't seemingly taught you anything."

Suicidality is multi-faceted. It's why there's recorded records of suicide attempts increasing when a highly-publicised suicide attempt happens, or when media portrays it such as in 13 Reasons why.

And when you're straddling that line - as you might imagine - your sense of rationality is sort of all over the place.

As with probably a lot of other influences in his life the responses of ChatGPT probably tugged him in a direction. And that alone is horrific.

> it's just ChatGPT.

Where did they claim that?