| ▲ | djrj477dhsnv 7 days ago |
| That's like saying God is the best explanation for any newly described natural phenomenon. |
|
| ▲ | pndy 6 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| May I interest you in "Calculating God" by Robert J. Sawyer? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculating_God?useskin=vector |
|
| ▲ | amenhotep 7 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How? We don't know gods exist. We know beings with technology and agency living on planets in space exist. There seems nothing at all similar between the two explanations. |
| |
| ▲ | bluGill 7 days ago | parent [-] | | Planet. Man has reach the moon (not in my lifetime) but that isn't a planet. There are robots out a little farther but so far as we can be sure only one planet has life. (you can calculate odds of others but there isn't enough data to be confident) |
|
|
| ▲ | fallat 7 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| God is an extraterrestial or not? :) |
| |
| ▲ | goatlover 6 days ago | parent [-] | | In the ancient view of the cosmos, God/gods, the heavens and other divine beings were part of the same universe. They were literally above the Earth, but made of a different kind of substance. Or down in the depths. At some point more this shifted to the divine being an entirely separate supernatural domain. |
|
