I agree. If there was one death for 1 million saves, maybe.

Instead, this just came up in my feed: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/08/chatgpt-helped-t...

rideontime 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

This is the same case that is being discussed, and your comment up-thread does not demonstrate awareness that you are, in fact, agreeing with the parent comment that you replied to. I get the impression that you read only the headline, not the article, and assumed it was a story about someone using ChatGPT for therapy and gaining a positive outcome.

▲

MBCook 6 days ago | parent [-]

I did! Because I can’t see past the paywall. I can’t even read the first paragraph.

So the headline is the only context I have.

	▲	rideontime 6 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I would advise you to gather more context before commenting in the future.
	▲	latexr 6 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		A link to bypass the paywall has been posted several hours before your comment, and currently sits at the top. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45027043 I recommend you get in the habit of searching for those. They are often posted, guaranteed on popular stories. Commenting without context does not make for good discussion.

▲

mvdtnz 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

What on Earth? You're posting an article about the same thing we're already discussing. If you want to contribute to the conversation you owe it to the people who are taking time out of their day to engage with you to read the material under discussion.