▲ | Fluorescence 6 days ago | |
Enough. You don't know what you are talking about. What's with posting 5 year old medium articles about a different version of Geekbench? Geekbench 5 had different multicore scaling so if you want to argue that version was so great then you are also arguing against Geekbench 6 because they don't even match. https://www.servethehome.com/a-reminder-that-geekbench-6-is-... "AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3995WX, a huge 64 core/ 128 thread part, was performing at only 3-4x the rate of an Intel D-1718T quad-core part, even despite the fact it had 16x the core count and lots of other features." "With the transition from Geekbench 5 to Geekbench 6, the focus of the Primate Labs team shifted to smaller CPUs" | ||
▲ | aurareturn 6 days ago | parent [-] | |
GB6 measures MT the way most consumer applications use MT. GB5 was embarrassingly parallel. It reflects real world usage more. |