▲ | jandrewrogers 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
> Apple Silicon is 2-4x more efficient than AMD and Intel CPUs during load while also having higher top end speed. This is not true. For high-throughput server software x86 is significantly more efficient than Apple Silicon. Apple Silicon optimizes for idle states and x86 optimizes for throughput, which assumes very different use cases. One of the challenges for using x86 in laptops is that the microarchitectures are server-optimized at their heart. ARM in general does not have the top-end performance of x86 if you are doing any kind of performance engineering. I don't think that is controversial. I'd still much rather have Apple Silicon in my laptop. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | aurareturn 6 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
In the server space, x86 has the highest performance right now. Yes. That's true. That's also because Apple does not make server parts. Look for Qualcomm to try to win the server performance crown in the next few years with their Oryon cores.That said, Graviton is at least 50% of all AWS deployments now. So it's winning vs x86.
I think you'll have to define what top-end means and what performance engineering means. | |||||||||||||||||
|