▲ | dcminter a day ago | |||||||
I don't think I agree; some of what's recommended here is what stops dysfunctional orgs from getting their shit together. Plus every developer believes they're a special and insightful little petal so all the caveats will get ignored. | ||||||||
▲ | extraisland a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
It is a Chesterton's fence type argument. You need to understand the rules, before you know which ones you can break and when you should break them. > Plus every developer believes they're a special and insightful little petal so all the caveats will get ignored. I don't believe that is true. I think there is a vocal minority of developers that would apply to. | ||||||||
▲ | scarface_74 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
As Kosh said, once the avalanche has started, the pebbles don’t have a vote. Unless you are high up in the organization, you can’t change a dysfunctional organization. It’s best to just leave. Hell as the most recent CEOs of Intel have found, even if you are high up in the org, you often can’t change a dysfunctional organization. | ||||||||
|